Beijing Times: Additive of hot pot reveals and supervises and lacks past
Whether the hot pot could add food additive, it was that one supervised the blank originally. But this can not become and avoid the responsibility reason, has proved instead the relevant department supervises the disappearance of responsibility. Some things can try by mistake, can food security never allow to try on by mistake. Depend on nowadays, why reply in the relevant responsibility department. Accused of adding the question of food additive such as being red of hot pot on the footing of hot pot, Xinhua News Agency followed the trail of the investigation recently. Expose, come out in the piece, it seems yet not only to the food security issue, give the confusion that food additive manages and supervises even. Various reports indicate, additive of hot pot propagates its belief on a large scale, not merely appear in Nanjing, Beijing, the other places are not rare. To supervision department, this should not be " unidentified garniture " . Whether they are safe, could use in this way, the relevant food superintendent office should express to some extent early, but we have not met the clear response all the time. Or how use the intersection of hot pot and additive about could use, should have unity, feasible standard, can't lack the essential trade norm. But Chinese food additive and relevant person of the batching association claim: "The universal standard about compound food additive of our country is still in the course of making. " Whether this is an excuse, show the relevant department in unordered state to the norm in advance of additive of hot pot, thus let manufacturer and hot pot shop bore the gap of the policy. Reporter's investigation finds, hot pot additive products on the market mostly print QS sign, the relevant certificate is complete. However, this can only prove these products are " qualified from theory " . The production process and supervising afterwards to the hot pot of additive is in lacking state. In recent years, the emergence of much food incidents, relate to the fact that food additive is abused and supervised and lacked. Such as the Sudan is red, clenobuterol hydrochloride, one drop are fragrant,etc., some can't add the food at all, some although there is not the law proclaimed in writing is harmful to human body. Three outburst which gather the cyanogen amine incident, has exposed legal norm and supervised the serious lagging of management completely even more. Such managerial confusion and even causing a laughing stock - -Enterprises obtain the award because the invention add and gather cyanogen amine in the milk to improve protein content and stability three times. Additive of hot pot is or unlikely to poison people to death, but only the bad producer and substitute which the hot pot shop developed, used for lowering costs. Article 45 of " food safety law " stipulates clearly: "Food additive should be really necessary technically and passes the evaluation certificate of the risk it is safe and reliable, Fang KeLie enters the range allowed to use. " A staff member of Beijing Health Inspection says: As to the thing that food and beverage service links could use food additive, how to control questions such as consumption and range,etc. effectively, our country does not have a clear regulation yet. Whether the hot pot could add food additive, it was that one supervised the blank originally. But this can not become and avoid the responsibility reason, has proved instead the relevant department supervises the disappearance of responsibility. Some things can try by mistake, can food security never allow to try on by mistake. On the occasion of severe winter at present, the regional business of hot pot shop is very lively. Once the additive has problems, are tantamount to putting to the hot pot into a time bomb. Since hot pot additive reveals and supervises the past lacked, should nowadays look, why tackle this question in the relevant responsibility department. (special commentator Wei YingJie)
|
No comments:
Post a Comment