Health newspaper: " see someone in mortal danger without lifting a finger to save him " There is no harm in assigning to law to manage

Health newspaper: " see someone in mortal danger without lifting a finger to save him " There is no harm in assigning to law to manage
Liao ShuiNan ( Media people) Have illness coming on to go into a coma Nanjing 15 day suddenly one person old man in bus,because take place hospitals nearest from thing only a station of ground, citizens urge the public transit driver to send off and cure at once, but because the driver can not " take on responsibility " 120 of insisting etc. was dealt with, the old man has already died when 120 ambulances are made dash for finally. Afterwards, the duke hands over to the collective in the department and claims the driver has no responsibility, it is to handle affairs according to the regulation. (" Yangzi Evening " of July 16) In fact, if it is in a coma to face one, even the patient dangerous to one's life, by " carry out company's system " In order to be refused to sue and labour, there is " see someone in mortal danger without lifting a finger to save him " It dislikes. Moreover, there is morality and justice above the system. Even if not have illness coming on on the bus, under the passenger's opinion in soliciting the car, the bus dashes for ward if the passerby is critically ill, have the responsibility to park and sue and labour immediately too. Because the life is the highest, ought to rescue artificially first. It perspects to be " common to hand over to the collective department have regulation is unable to transport patients " Explanation,getting more implicit among them,it is more if you can't afraid of, " own thing after bearing by corresponding responsibility and every one, hang up high " Selfishness with indifference. " the law is the lowest morals, the morals are supreme laws " . But the morals condemn more and more unconvincing and unable, there is no support in law. On the contrary, review it abroad, aggravate to seeing someone in mortal danger without lifting a finger to save him through criminal law,etc. behavioral discipline is not specific. " France's punishment code " stipulates: Anyone, to others in the danger, individual can take action, or can arouse the rescue action, and not dangerous to its I or third person, and give up succouring on purpose, imprisoned and combined fine of 500,000 francs of department in 5 in the place. " " Italy's punishment code " stipulates too: "Remain to the breath, injuring or critical people, is negligent of the essential succour or persons who have not informed of officer's administration immediately, sentence to fine of under 120,000 liras of sentence or department under 3 months. " If it is already powerless to save by the morals only, there is no harm in studying the foreign outstanding experience, construct it by legal means, punish the collective cold and detachedly, return the beauty of human nature and life. In addition bus driver see someone in mortal danger without lifting a finger to save him, certainly can criticize, common to hand over to the collective department on the issue that a case involving human life is to be treated with the utmost care, refuse to make an exception, it " has no responsibility " to handle affairs according to the regulation even state outright a driver ,Should not condemn?

|