Health newspaper: The ones that lose more than gain " Tear a case history doctor "

Health newspaper: The ones that lose more than gain " Tear a case history doctor "
Zuo XiangJun ( Teacher) A few days ago, less than 2 -year-old boy babies Su, because had a fever in the unexpected death after infusion of the hospital of east China of Dongguan, its doctor in charge tore up the case history silently unexpectedly. This incident is caused the extensive concern after disclosure. Dongguan Municipal Health Bureau released notifying, called the doctor in charge and tore up the behavior that the case history of the clinic was recorded and rewritten without authorization on the grounds that the writing is hasty and careless yesterday, violate the relevant laws and regulations, already the quilt has been temporarily relieved of one's post for self-examination. (" The Southern City " of November 12) I estimate, that " tears a case history doctor " now ,It is certain to be overcome with regret the mistake made by oneself originally. Because the relevant expert organized by Dongguan Municipal Health Bureau afterwards appraises, this infant's aetiology examining report has positive for E V71 type result, diagnose as mouths ill ( E V 7 1 ) of brothers tentatively Suspected death case. That is to say it is ill that Su dies of serious disease mouths of brothers. Conclusion though and in charge the intersection of doctor and " upper airway infection originally this, generate heat and wait to check " Different, but the relevant expert's investigation finds, the doctor has no mistake of sense of principle to ill treatment and administration. It is actually easy to understand too as to this conclusion. Because in some infective diseases, though disease names are not different sometimes, but it is very much the same to use medicine and deal with in principle, basically unanimous. That is to say in this, if the doctor in charge did not tear up and rewrite the case history originally, in fact his fault basically too with too great nothing. The key to the question is, after infant's death, because the doctor lacks corresponding responsibility to take on, having played with a cleverness in trivial matters, this tears and changes without authorization, not only violate the relevant regulations of laws and regulations such as " operation medicine is imitated ",etc., and have to be temporarily relieved of one's post for self-examination, will wait for the end of Dongguan Municipal Health Bureau to " deal with correspondingly according to the weight of situation " painfully at the same time . This really loses more than gain. The patient comes to the hospital to see the doctor, the doctors will all make all-out efforts to carry on meticulous diagnosis and treat for them, no one will make fun of the patient's life on purpose. However, because the restriction of technology of making a diagnosis of different and modern medical science of complexity of the critical and diagnosis of disease that the patient suffers from, if you want to send for a doctor Bao Zhi one hundred disease and have in the intersection of course and fault that make a diagnosis and give treatment, that can not be unrealistic too. But key of question, as doctor in course of treatment, death by accident or make a diagnosis while offsetting, how the doctor deal with, will tear up the case history afterwards, rewrite and diagnose, thus cover the mistake being treated up, dare to bear responsibility, the accident is transferred to the third party to get involved openly and solve just and fairly. This tested every doctor's morals bottom line, determined the trend of the state of affair too sometimes. Only deal with correctly, patient and his relative will be satisfied, check in mistake that doctors will not make for oneself either.

|