From the public " Can't understand " The medical reform scheme is said and driven to

From the public " Can't understand " The medical reform scheme is said and driven to
After medical reform the intersection of scheme and draft announce October 15, CCTV " the 1+1 news " so as to promptly the same day <>It is a question, broadcasting Dong Qian and program which Bai Yansong presided over. Speak why scheme understand medical reform, wire the intersection of expert and Liu GuoEn Professor of Peking University again mainly. He " whether afford to watch, but fee order the strength" . Can not understand, this says the public heartfelt wishes in the main. Ten thousands of numerous speeches, a lot of people read confusedly, as Bai Yansong 's saying " a little astringent, some winds, a little empty, there is some specially " . As soon as the draft is just a announcement, the first public response could not be understood, this make draughtsman to be a bit awkward rather, let people know whether to laugh and cry a little rather, it is even a little ridiculous. But the original intention of the draft is good, act so cautiously, it is certainly a thing that is worth praising. The root cause of such result lies in the writing style. A medical reform scheme related to common people's vital interests, it is the focal point that people care about that its one's own content is natural. This obstacle of the writing style that but cannot help but encounter, let can not " understand " Become centre that people discuss, it is draughtsman unexpected unwilling to see to be true. But this shows from a side, " new eight-part essay " The harmful influence of the writing style is very wide and very deep, so that is distracting to a certain extent. Therefore, just it is very necessary to bypass the medical reform scheme, it is this " new eight-part essay " The writing style writes out a prescription. Feel pulse " new eight-part essay " Writing style, obtain main symptom and is three in the main: First, it is large but impractical to argue. Second, say the thing is wishy-washy, the principle of analyzing and solving the problem is abstract, but not concrete and careful. Third, the language deals in generality, specialized, academic, dilatory, sew too many languages. To be objective, although these symptoms of the medical reform scheme are not serious, it is more difficult to already let people read. The issue in an important policy, action,etc., should certainly explain some major principles. It is easy to strengthen people's understanding of their importance that there is this, benefit people's better understanding and assurance. But the major principle can't be large but impractical, should have a sense of propriety, should be brief, pointed even more. Speak too much, will dilute the theme, cause people to understand the difficulty on in major principle. Reason speak, focal point say thing just. Since say the thing will be concrete and careful, it can't be only the abstract, principle. Analyze, the medical reform scheme is mainly to say the thing, but make people obscure, what its reason lay in mostly using is languages dealing in generality, some are too specialization, academic. The sentence is not succinct, often a word is read very tired, there are too many slight-pause marks, commas, it is just very apt to make people puzzled. " new eight-part essay " The very doing of writing style, can be said to be " contribution " of characters craftsmans . Sit office all day long, read the intersection of surface and material, write things that come out very easy from concept to concept certainly, deduce each other according to logic. Like this, certainly the result has enough and to spare rigorously, vivid and lifelike and insufficient. The more serious one is, the thing written stands stable, very correct, but it is very difficult to solve the practical problem. The reason lies in characters craftsmans make investigations to a gleam of, the crux too on the issue that can't stress, can't say the pointed words. The phenomenon, just as early years one very getting vivid to point out leading comrades: "Appear last one question, look for last a gang of people, turn off the intersection of window and door, make last article, read to read smoothly very much, but does not solve the problem. " The appeal about improving the writing style, never disconnected over the years. Put emphasis on pressing close to reality, pressing close to life, pressing close to the masses very much too these years, want the smooth language of loving, clear dawn with the masses more. But if write oneself is few " Three is pressed close to " ,His characters " Three is pressed close to " It has difficulty in to stand up, lifelike and vivid languages are not many. It seems, " no investigation, no right to speak " ,One may well say to pay attention to. (the Chen 's revitalizes)

|