Beijing Times: Vaccine must be asked the responsibility in the administration to handle problem
The enterprise of Jiangsu, Hebei, two medicines, produces, sells to inferior people and uses vaccine of rabies the fine of 30 million yuan of place, revoking the production qualification of vaccine, the relevant personnel of the company receives and deals with correspondingly. And according to CCTV " news 1+1 ", as to this time " in accordance with the law severely " Handle, the public feels that neither heavy enough, seem a little light too. Concern about enterprise's punishment might as well bring to a temporary paragraphs, see how the offender behaves. In fact the public wants even more to know whether this serious medicines incident will start the administration and ask the responsibility procedure next, deal with the relevant department head? Inferior vaccine of two medicines enterprise flows into the whole country, the supervision department can hardly absolve oneself of the blame. Question vaccine produce on 2008, question expose the end of last year, already the past half years. According to this situation, ones that should be investigated have probably investigated, ones that should draw a conclusion probably have a conclusion too, why announce, to to handle enterprise, see administration ask the responsibility investigate only? After the vaccine incident of the problem happens, the supervision department has taken the control measure in time, production and sale of ordering enterprises to stop all products, and recall the relevant products. The notification of national Bureau of Drugs Supervision still mentions, the Ministry of Health has already taken and reseeded the measure in time; Medicine supervises the department and adjusts and sends vaccine of enough quantity to inoculating some promptly, launch the work of reseeding free; Have not received the bad incident report that vaccine of question has caused, the cloud cloud yet at present. Even if the measures all make sure in location, belong to remedying afterwards. Is the relevant supervision department only responsible for supervising afterwards? No matter how say it can not be unacceptable. The relevant department is not only responsible for examining and approving in advance, supervising afterwards but also have corresponding supervisory duties to links such as production, circulation, using,etc.. Why meet accident, do these preceding working links all look but see not? Since duty-bound to defend the territory of one's country, and according to the relevant regulation, once go wrong and should investigate the responsibility about person in charge, why not start and ask the responsibility procedure even after stalling for a long time, check one knows? The focal point of the question may be here. Run into the similar great accident, if punish severely only for enterprises, and does not go to investigate the responsibility of the relevant person in charge, have endless trouble. Food, medicines trade repeatly act in collusion with business people now, form the huge interests roller chain. If does not ask the responsibility, law the means of punishing etc. with the administration, cut the relevant interests roller chain firmly, the enterprise, because of rush, go ashore by the intersection of issue and products, more likely than not to other corrupt officials will mount the enterprise pirate ship tomorrow today then. Punish only enterprises severely, function is really limited. Unfortunately, not merely people of these two vaccine accidents have not seen yet the administration ask the figure of the responsibility, Shanxi vaccine incident had no reply too till now, notified it was a sound of mouth that claimed to be investigated further, never condoned at that time. Punishing the illegal enterprise is one thing, investigating relevant department and officers' responsibility is another, do not ask the responsibility in place of the administration in order to punish enterprises severely. Special commentator Wei YingJie
|
No comments:
Post a Comment